The Iron Oak Monk

"Be religiously fervent in living life righteously as yourself, like a mighty oak of iron and a priestly soul of fire."
moofles:

vincenzof:

moofles:

communismkills:

I’ve never met a conservative who wants the government in marriage. They understand government is the biggest threat to their religion. Strawman?

Probably not so much a strawman as not having any idea what the hell we actually want. Any liberals I’ve explained it to seem really surprised.

It’s not a strawman.  That’s stupid.  If you believe it’s a strawman, then explain all the laws like DOMA and all the clamoring for a constitutional amendment to define “marriage” as between a man and a woman.  It ain’t liberals pushing that.
The picture is dead-on.  Conservatives hate big government right up to the point where they can use it to protect conservatism, then it’s just peachy keen. 

That’s great, except myself and every other conservative I know don’t want the government in marriage. I don’t know if you know this, but people who liked DOMA could vote in 1996, unlike people like me who were four years old when it passed. See, this might come as a shock, but in society attitudes among a specific group can change. Now, nearly a decade later, WE WANT GOVERNMENT OUT OF MARRIAGE ALTOGETHER. The views expressed on the page I have about it are far more widespread than you think.
I think we would know what conservatives want when we are conservatives. 

I rather no marriage laws at all other than age of consent.

moofles:

vincenzof:

moofles:

communismkills:

I’ve never met a conservative who wants the government in marriage. They understand government is the biggest threat to their religion. Strawman?

Probably not so much a strawman as not having any idea what the hell we actually want. Any liberals I’ve explained it to seem really surprised.

It’s not a strawman.  That’s stupid.  If you believe it’s a strawman, then explain all the laws like DOMA and all the clamoring for a constitutional amendment to define “marriage” as between a man and a woman.  It ain’t liberals pushing that.

The picture is dead-on.  Conservatives hate big government right up to the point where they can use it to protect conservatism, then it’s just peachy keen. 

That’s great, except myself and every other conservative I know don’t want the government in marriage. I don’t know if you know this, but people who liked DOMA could vote in 1996, unlike people like me who were four years old when it passed. See, this might come as a shock, but in society attitudes among a specific group can change. Now, nearly a decade later, WE WANT GOVERNMENT OUT OF MARRIAGE ALTOGETHER. The views expressed on the page I have about it are far more widespread than you think.

I think we would know what conservatives want when we are conservatives.

I rather no marriage laws at all other than age of consent.

(Source: timlebsack)

  1. thesoundofnat reblogged this from crying-over-merlin
  2. crying-over-merlin reblogged this from candycoateddoom
  3. candycoateddoom reblogged this from aliewa
  4. angie-laughing-alone-with-salad reblogged this from social-darwin-awards
  5. sciencehastheanswers reblogged this from argusofinsight
  6. areyoufuckingkiddingmeamerica reblogged this from argusofinsight
  7. progressivefriends reblogged this from argusofinsight
  8. ishyismagic reblogged this from argusofinsight and added:
    Thank you Based Thor
  9. argusofinsight reblogged this from tomii-writes
  10. felinewithin reblogged this from aliewa
  11. tomii-writes reblogged this from abhortion
  12. chicagoknight reblogged this from geng-ar
  13. geng-ar reblogged this from aliewa
  14. legitprivilege reblogged this from abhortion and added:
    As a ruman catholoc, I am very offendid by these hateful comments. Please chack your praveluge.
  15. aliewa reblogged this from abhortion and added:
    Thinks all lives are sacred (Unless you’re homosexual)
  16. trans-vegan reblogged this from abhortion
  17. abhortion reblogged this from social-darwin-awards and added:
    Remember how only Catholics - sorry, catholocs - are the only people allowed to get married because they defined...
  18. social-darwin-awards reblogged this from abhortion and added:
    Oh yeah, that’s another thing. Marriage was conceived in Hinduism.
  19. tavkarezi reblogged this from social-darwin-awards and added:
    I don’t understand. So your saying if the Government had such a thing as true religious freedom, Homosexuals could not...
  20. lockless reblogged this from social-darwin-awards and added:
    You guys are unaware or imbecilic. Marriage as defined by most conservatives as the Religious. And based on the religion...
  21. whimsicalapothecary reblogged this from social-darwin-awards
  22. robotbutler reblogged this from therepublitarian